Other base of my philosophy : Internationalism (and anti-nationalism)

Competition between nations kills General Interest. This is how to sum up the base of this part of my philosophy.
Let's give the best recent example :

- 2010 Copenhaguen process failure : United States refuses to forego some growth to cut pollution if China don't do it also, because they want to keep their world influence. China says that they are still considered as a poor country (GDP per capita), and don't want to do it. The process to save earth is a failure.

Who can say that somebody have been wrong ? That's the competition between nations who created this failure.
The only way to stop the competition between nations is to make a Federal government with as fonction to ensure World Defense against Wars, Terrorism, Mafias and Drug Trafic. And to ensure General human and animal and environment interest. Nothing else.


The probematic of this utopy is to respect the local cultures. To ensure it, I think that this utopic federation should be enough decentralized in 3 stages/floors :
- The federal internationalist floor (I wrote the role just before)
- The society floor : I consider that our values are similar according to our beliefs. In this perspective, societal laws could be the same in all christian provinces in the world (respect a maximum freedom), in all muslim provinces in the world (making their Charia, but not other laws who would reduce freedom), in all non-believer provinces in the world, etc. It makes 4 or 5 societal systems in the total (depending if Jewish consider themselves differents than christians). This floor shall have a constition guardian of freedom (as much as possible, without reducing their belief influence who is a priority).
- The local floor : I consider that native language influences also (less than beliefs) human culture. Every zone with comon language in each society floor (so common beliefs also) could have their own local administration.
This elected administration can decide administration language(s). Their responsability is to install (or refuse to install) their social system, and to invest in zones with a lack of public infrastructures (priority to these zones).
Local floor would have to respect the consitution of "society floor".


Can you tell me in this condition, who would be against this utopic system ?


When I consider that Internationalism is super-hard but not impossible. When I consider that Nations are against General Interest. I think that the only reasons why people are Nationalists/Patriots are their ignorance or their racism. Both of them are to fight (by dialogue).